ABC Imagem Cardiovasc. 2026; 39(1): e20250082

Diagnostic Performance Of Contrast-Enhanced Echocardiography In Differentiating Cardiac Masses: A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis

João Guilherme G. , Felizardo José Leandro , Antonio Lacerda Cavalcanti , Renata Ramos , Giordano Persuhn Rolim de , Marcelo , Sadrak Lyon Dantas , Alex dos Santos

DOI: 10.36660/abcimg.20250082i

This Original Article is referred by the Short Editorial "Echocardiography with Ultrasound Enhancement Agents and the Diagnostic Challenge of Cardiac Masses: Solid Evidence for a Complex Clinical Problem".

Abstract

Background

Conventional echocardiography often struggles to differentiate intracardiac masses, particularly in patients with poor acoustic windows. Contrast-enhanced Echocardiography (CEE) overcomes this limitation by visualizing perfusion patterns — distinguishing avascular thrombi from vascularized tumors. We aimed to synthesize existing evidence to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEE.

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEE for differentiating cardiac masses in adults, using histopathology as reference and reporting AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV.

Methods

Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were performed on August 10, 2025. Studies meeting PICOTT criteria were included; extracted data included sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and 2×2 tables. Pooled estimates were obtained using standard bivariate and SROC models for diagnostic meta-analysis. Statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

Results

Five prospective cohort studies (total n = 381 patients) were included. For tumor vs non-tumor, pooled sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 100% (95% CI 99.5–100%; I2 = 0%; heterogeneity P = 0.985), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) = 3,890.65, AUC = 0.989. For malignant vs benign tumors, pooled sensitivity = 94.3% (95% CI 88.5–97.3%; I2 = 0%; P = 0.681), specificity = 96.1% (95% CI 91.5–98.2%; I2 = 0%; P = 0.970), DOR = 341.71, SROC AUC = 0.976.

Conclusions

CEE showed very high diagnostic accuracy in the available prospective series. However, the small number of studies and limited sample sizes warrant cautious interpretation; larger prospective multicenter studies with standardized CEE protocols are needed to confirm these results.

Diagnostic Performance Of Contrast-Enhanced Echocardiography In Differentiating Cardiac Masses: A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis

Comments

Skip to content